Archive 2025-08

I was so angry after coming across this information, 12% of white women under 25 are now internet prostitutes, so that I made a cute video compilation to express my response. Without even researching it, I know already that it likely is true, or it could even be worse if you also count other whore parameters besides this internet brothel website. Even if it was only 5%, that would be enough to rage. But 12%?

Thiel married his long-time partner, Matt Danzeisen, in Vienna, Austria, on Thiel’s 50th birthday (October 2017)

Peter Theil, being highly involved in team Trump now, I was inspired. Especially with this Palantir thing he leads, an AI technology advancement and collaboration in government, intertwined in surveillance, whatever part of the system that highlights keywords anybody might say or type and brings them to the attention of human controllers to check on if they hit enough parameters that they’re looking for. It gives me a direct connection in that regard. Then also considering the high profile history with JD Vance. And combine it all the this “respectable” gay man image some gays try so hard to break free from the stereotype of gay men as sick perverts.

Dear Peter Theil: If you actually loved him, then you wouldn’t do that to him.

The receiving end of sexual activity is a subjugation, a humiliation, a degradation, a conquering, a power move, an invasion, a token of obedience and subservience and handing over of control and authority. Women are compensated for this in the promotion to and honor of motherhood; on top of having evolutionarily perfected biology that equips her mentally and physically to compensate for this sexual activity “loss” (take a self lubricating sexual reception area as the most basic metaphor). Men can not receive sexual activity from another man with dignity in the same way that a man can not get pregnant.

And so I repeat, if you loved him you wouldn’t do that to him. What kind of brotherhood degrades, invades, and diminishes the power and strength of his brother? How is the love between men in a brotherhood different than the love you claim you have with what you call your husband?

Time for a cold shower. What you have is an addiction and twisted mind perversion equivalent to a terrible drug habit. It needs to stop and you need to hear the cold harsh truth that you are like a schizophrenic meth head idiot that spouts off constantly about how “meth is good for you”. Bruh… Time to take the pipe out of your mouth and open your eyes to the fact that you are in the midst of a “drug addict” homeless disgusting living under a bridge in his own filth lifestyle. Any family member that truly loved you would scoop you up against your will and bring you by force to sanitary conditions and heal your wounds and mind. If you were my brother, or son, or father; then I would do it myself. That is real love, brotherhood. The meme against Trans people, is that they’re bitter and resentful that nobody will accept them as a woman. It’s the same with gay men: you are resentful that a man being on the receiving end of sex can never be given the same positive spin as you can give to a woman on the receiving end of sex. You can never be a woman, you can never get pregnant, and you can’t have sex with another man without committing a vile atrocity against love and brotherhood.

Pack up your stuff, it’s time for anti-gay boot camp. You want to be part of the group of men that will lead and change the world and take it back from the evil corrupt powers? You need to clean yourself up first. In my book, if you’re familiar with it, I called it the “Anti-Transsexual-Man Priesthood”, considering homosexuality to be one of the first stages of transsexuality. And I also discussed the needed formation of a “Heterosexual Club”. By the powers bestowed upon me as the high priest of the Anti-Transexual-Man Priesthood, I hereby consecrate you with true brotherly love by assisting you to conquer the perversions that have been injected into your mind during the course of your bad luck interactions with the toxic primordial ooze of vile human conduct. Let me be clear from the start, that you will never be able to fully regain the manhood you lost by your actions; such is the irreversible consequences of homosexual man activity as the same as the irreversibility of death. But what you can regain is a knowledge of what was taken away from you, and become the protector of future young men who will face the same dangers to their manhood as you did. And once recovered, your knowledge and insight into the gay man mind will contribute to helping us assist other men recover and to prevent other men from losing their sacred manhood.

But first, the cold shower. Calling you out, brother, for exactly the filth you bathe yourself in every day. You are truly disgusting, brother. You truly hold no sexual attraction for me, brother. You repulse me, brother. Come, brother, and let us attend the daily conference of Heterosexual Club together, to ease our minds and to distract us from the putrid smell of your life.

Sieg Heil.

When there is peace between nations, the border is along the mountain; when there is war, along the river.

Mountains are a difficult line to hold in wartime. Battles take place pushing to the river on one side. Unsteady “peace” full of tension places borders along the river for the same reason. Peoples want to control their source of water; sharing a river is against instinct. You can look at any neighbor nations in the world and identify tension by looking at if their borders are on mountains or hills, or along rivers.

River basin boundaries identify the most significant mountains and hills in any land area. My philosophy has been to take river basin boundaries as a starting point for identifying appropriate borders between land connected nations, and then to analyze history to determine which single people is native to a river basin which belongs to them in a world at peace and not determined by “might makes right” or by the law of “whoever conquered it”. But because of military strategy, these righteous boundaries are only possible when two nations are truly at peace, and not simply positioning and posturing excuses for land grabs to satisfy military strategy for inevitable war.

Seeing the overarching importance of these lines of separation most quickly identified by river basin boundaries, thus I’ve spent a long time mapping out these lines in thick dark blue on the maps below. While explicitly mapping out river basins, they fundamentally represent the most significant mountains and hills in a landmass:

Take the Ukraine Russia war for example, one of the most tense places on earth; battle lines have frozen exactly on the river in the south. Military proceeds from river to river in the east. Even the Korean Demilitarized Zone border, said to be first place amongst tense situations, is primarily along various river lines.

Take a look at the major river basins in central Europe. The border between France and Germany along the Rhine river showcases the intense long term hostility between France and Germany which has seen back and forth war in this region for thousands of years. Switzerland has great borders situated primarily along the Aare river basin even while part of the Rhine River still Switzerland is a culturally German state; and Italy also along the river basins bordered at the Alps mountains, this signifies highly stable relations with their neighbors. Meanwhile Germany and France seem to have unsettled conflicts. These conclusions are obvious either by a simple viewing of the river basins compared to borders, or by an advanced study of history.

The boundaries of Poland follow along its basin boundaries very closely; signifying a correctly identified parcel of land; yet keep in mind that the Slavic peoples were pushed west into this area, kicking the native Germans out, over the course of 2000 years of Asian conquerors, and recent communist evils (perhaps propped up by post-Golden-Horde Asian shadow controllers evidenced by North Korean Troops fighting in Ukraine and strong Russian ties to China). The poor Slavs being subjugated and tortured in their native eastern lands causing a mass exodus of Slavs over millennia into places like Poland, Baltics, and the Yugoslavia region in the Danube River basin; such that even as a German, I do not resent Slavs for taking these areas but see them as beloved members of the white race who had their homes taken and needed refuge which I am happy to see them attain in German lands rather than to see them die off at the hands of Atilla Huns, Mongols, or in communist gulags famous for their cruelty.

Another point of interest is the enormous Danube River basin, which according to this theory must be assigned to one single group of people. Until recently, my study of history had pointed me to a Slavic nativity in the Danube basin, or an Illyrian or Thracian white subrace that I haven’t discovered yet. And I reluctantly let in thoughts about Germans in Bavaria and Austria give me consideration to German nativity, yet I held this thought back because already I have been identifying truly vast sums of land as German native adding up to almost half the northern hemisphere. I call it “Greater Germania”

For a long time I’ve held myself back on identifying even the Danube also as German homeland. Yet my recent studies of history before Attila’s raid have caused me to recognize the Danube also as part of the German sphere. Let my long reluctance to take this position for the last decade since I’ve been studying it serve as some kind of evidence that I really am not trying to be biased towards Germans since I am one. But it appears that the German affinity for success even on remote arctic coastlines has caused their race to be the most successful and widespread on earth. I do recognize the Scandanavian, Norse, Celtic, English, and French all as different branches in the large spectrum of the German race. Though France is a bit complicated considering their connection to the ancient Trojan race.

I’ve heard of land swaps being discussed as possible solutions toward a peace between Russia and Ukraine. These thoughts of river basin boundaries cause me to imagine some dream swap which would shift toward these philosophically correct borders in a first step:

I imagine this orange border as encompassing the entirety of the homeland of the Slavic race. If these are 2 tribes of the Slavic race at war, then I could see their division along the Dneiper, Don, and Volga basins. Considering Belarus as a puppet nation of Russia to be dissolved at some future date, which could see Ukraine collecting the entirety of their Dneiper basin. And even if Russia really is some Asian puppet state, still if they were to be freed later on, it would train the common folk to accept these basin boundaries in the meantime. It also seems like a fairly equal land trade if you consider Russia keeping Crimea and most of the lands it has already seized from Ukraine; which absolutely cannot be released by Russia or else their common folk would rebel against their leaders for sending their soldiers to die for land that was not even kept. And the Ukrainians would receive solace in the lives of their own soldiers lost by receiving a very significant piece of Russia.

Yet, as I said, these would be borders for a real peace time, and if Russia really is an enemy state controlled by bad guys, then that would mean tensions between their state and ours, which would mean military strategy having the priority and thus the rivers would become the borders of a stalemate; which is what we have currently and military strategy would not allow Russia to give up secure borders along a river in exchange difficult to defend hill or mountain borders.

That aside, even direct enemies of Trump are also using this same gang attack. They’re criticizing a Fox interview yesterday where Trump made some really nothing-burger comment about how he wants to get into heaven. In context, when you listen to it, Trump made some really bland normy style conversation that is a common conversational piece, half-heartedly half-joking making fun of himself with “I hear I’m not doing that good” at getting to heaven, and using it as a quick conversation comparison to showcase what he’s doing is so good that it should be used as evidence to get into heaven; hardly being very serious in tone and totally appropriate. Yet, leftist and Jones now to want to take this casual conversation and turn it into as if it was some cringe dark serious inappropriate public reflection that shows he is a nervous wreck about his afterlife. Literally all this from a 10 second standard conversational piece?

Next is an accusation that on Mark Levin’s recent show, Trump inappropriately called himself a war hero in a way that is cringe. After a handful of attempts to find the full context segment of the clip of the comment, all these accusers only post this short 5 second snippets of the conversation, which is suspicious in itself. I’ll listen to the full context episode of the Levin show later, but just looking at the short war hero clips, the comment seems entirely appropriate. He refers to Netanyahu as a war hero in reference to his long term participation in Israeli wars against arab Islamic world dominance.

In the sense of high level public figures in politics being simply part of the war theater of public propaganda and exposing themselves to different kinds of major dangers and personal life disruption; they truly are soldiers of the highest importance and fully credibly can be labeled as war heroes also. Is a submariner not a soldier because he faces torpedoes instead of the same bullets a field infantryman faces? Are Trump and Netanyahu not warriors because they face the infinitude of assassination attempts and public disfigurement and the unleashing of the horde of the zombified public upon them, instead of field battle bullets? Trump, participating in the civil war inside the American government, fighting on the front lines against a major theater of battle in private American closed door politics, and no doubt avoiding a draft into the vietnam war theater dangers in order to join this other war theater; if even the Vietnam war was not a creation of bad guy powers to give the same reason of dodging the vietnam war as for dodging a bullet from the enemy (I have not yet studied the details of the vietnam war). In this way, is Trump not a soldier in every regard and if I am not terribly mistaken he is having such successes for the good guys that I fully would give him credit as a war hero; yet he humbly says in a non-serious tone “I guess I am too” with the same energy of someone who is forced to compliment themselves uncomfortably for a job interview. They use this for the basis of a Trump attack, and Alex Jones joins in? I am fully on team Trump; and it is hard for me to imagine that even the stupidity of the masses of the public will prevent their instinct to recognize these attacks on Trump as more evidence that Trump is facing flack because he is over the target and he is truly “our guy”. Or is the public mass of normies really so dumb that this piling on a stupid attack angle can be effective?

I hope to see some moves soon in developing Trump’s successor in one of his sons who will carry the mantle of the trust that Trump has earned, which can only be passed on to a son; personally I would not trust any endorsement more than the man’s own spirit himself in the new body of his son and successor. Will the Trumps go for a successor in the eldest son Donald Trump Jr.? Or in the youngest son Barron. They both seem to be getting set up to take on major roles in this public figure war theater. Even the middle son Eric is highly involved. And I actually have had a strange personal experience a few years ago in a face to face interaction with Donald Jr. that makes me wonder about a great many things I won’t mention here.

Jones continues what he calls a “loving” assault on this our beloved alpha male leader most likely to achieve success. Assuming Jones is not an enemy and authentic at least some of the time, then I do not understand how he justifies going after Trump like this again and again. History proves that what gives a group strength is unity behind a single leader. Yet, Jones continually uses the meme among right wing figures whenever they criticize Trump that they “are not in a cult”. War on language to spread confusion with politicking words like “cult” which is short for “culture” which simply means the general values and practices of a unified group. In that meaning, a cult is exactly what we need and in history has been known as the cult of the emperor. News “purple” showcasing my support of kings and emperors as the most natural and healthy form of government for humans. Alex Jones is a genius of epic proportions, and I have no doubt he knows all these things and has hidden motives and agendas; as I always say, making it impossible to surely identify Jones as a good or bad guy, as he is playing characters for the sake of propaganda maneuvering… I can only hope that Alex Jones is a good guy; because if not, then we have a terrible monster of intellect to contend against. This is why I follow Alex Jones so closely, because I feel I can learn much from any genius, whether they are a good or bad guy.

he shows of what seems to me to be a very healthy looking ankle, or maybe you could argue slightly swollen, or really I might even use a picture like this to cite the health of his ankles looking fine. But really you can not tell anything for sure behind a sock. Yet Jones goes on to cite this picture as the most clear as day evidence of EXTREME LARGE CRAZY ANKLES! Again, Jones is too smart for this to be authentic, so it remains to wonder what propaganda maneuver he is trying with this.

Lastly, Jones goes off into a tirade about Trump being a workaholic to the point of him not taking needed rest which is making him sloppy and dumb in the morning and at night-times especially; but Jones gives him credit for being sharp during the day such as the recent afternoon meeting he held with European leaders in Washington DC about the Ukraine war. These arguments do not hold up and Jones cites no credible evidence and shows no videos or audios of any kind of proof of Trump being sloppy and overworked to the point of screwing up. Jones does mention “get into heaven” and “war hero” comments as evidence, but like I said, these comments were totally appropriate and not sloppy at all.

At the end of the day, with all things considered, let’s not forget that Trump is at the level of also possibly having a team of look-alikes representing his person; and his role is so high level that it can be totally possible that his image and public representation is controlled to the point that even if the real Trump (if there even ever was one) dies or falls into ill-health; if this is not in line with where they want to take Trump’s public image, then they will obviously replace him or the current look-alike with a new one and keep the plan going without disruption. Such high level figures at this stage in the game of technology and worldwide media, I do not imagine that they leave long term plans to the chances of sudden health developments. Meaning, if “Trump” ever “falls ill”, then it will because they planned it that way. And up to this point, Trump is performing at such a high level of skill and proficiency, that you could argue that his high performance is unrealistic for a 79 year old, and that it is suspicious that he is NOT getting sloppy or making any mistakes. Where as Jones on the other hand is trying to argue the opposite using the most unconvincing arguments and examples.

Seig Heil.

I suddenly thought I should put into the ether some basic common sense logic I have sort of taken for granted the last 5 years. Women, being in the case that sexual activity is internal by nature for them, and considering that reproduction for them involves the changing of the interior of their body in response to a specific male, and that purity of sexual activities in a female correspond to the purity and patrilineal identification of her children; which in turn give rise to the quality of males across most species to be vigilant and protective of the their chosen female… thus it places women in a logical category of greatly different conclusions for how men and women should be treated in society to account for these basic facts of our biology. Thoughts of human equality accorded to each gender should not forget that while we are equal in value, we are also different in form, and logic should reflect our differences.

With that said, I have laid out what I think are the fundamental basics for gender relations. Because of women’s sexually internal nature, it makes the situation logical that men take the lead and dominant role in the family and in society which is evident in the natural processes of humanity even without any rules for order; commonly known as the gender roles that evolve in any organism. The commonly known gender roles for humans are males as a protector/hunter master of the external, and females as a nurturer and master of the internal. Think of women as a habitat/land that the man enters and makes his home. Thus we should think of women in the same way mankind views resources of land and habitat. There must be an order into how we go about disputes and deciding what land and resources belong to who. And in this sense I arrive at the conclusion that women must be associated with and belong to a man who takes charge of her exclusively from other men. And now I will lay out the exact details of what man a woman should rightly belong to:

*Capitalized words are defined at the end.

SYSTEM: WHO A WOMAN BELONGS TO

• A virgin female at first belongs to her father.
• If no father can be found, then she belongs to next highest BRANCH PATRIARCH available of her father’s RACE.
• If no PATRIARCH of her father’s RACE can be found, then she belongs to the PATRIARCH of her father’s ETHNICITY.
• If no patriarch of her father’s ETHNICITY can be found, then war among her father’s RACE decides who she belongs to.
• If no father can be identified, then war among her ETHNICITY decides who she belongs to.
• If no ETHNICITY can be agreed upon, then war among humanity decides who she belongs to.

VIRGINITY CLARIFICATION

• When a female has LOWER SEX with a man, then she belongs to that man and he has 1 year to have HIGHER SEX with her before she returns to who she belonged to as a virgin.
• When a female has HIGHER SEX with a man, then she belongs to that man and he replaces any who previously may have had LOWER SEX with her.
• When a female has her first child, then she belongs to the father of that child forever and he replaces any who previously may have had sex with her.
• Who she belongs to can not be transferred for any other reasons.

DEFINITIONS

• LOWER SEX: When a female touches a male’s reproductive organ.
• HIGHER SEX: When a male touches the inside of a female’s reproductive organ, or a female internalizes the fluid of a male’s reproductive organ.
• RACE: All the members of a unilineal group.
• ETHNICITY: All the members of a blood related group of people through untracked lineages with common physical and mental characteristics.
• PATRIARCH: The youngest brother of the oldest generation of patrilineal ancestors at the age of stability as agreed upon by the patriline. If no age of stability is agreed upon, then the age of stability is when he finishes puberty. If this younger brother has sons at the age of stability, then the youngest brother of these is the patriarch. If there are more generations of youngest brother males after this, then the youngest brother at the age of stability of the most recent generation is the patriarch. Before his birth, if the mother of any patrilineal member has had HIGHER SEX with anyone besides his father, then he cannot become patriarch and his patrilineal group will start over with him as the founding member.
• BRANCH PATRIARCH: The PATRIARCH of selected brother branch according to the same way a PATRIARCH is determined but within only that that one member’s descendants.
• ETHNICITY PATRIARCH: Patriarch of the RACE of the ruler of an ETHNICITY.

On July 23, South Park released its first regular episode in over 2 years. I finally had time to watch it. The entire episode revolves around a back and forth, from mocking Jesus and Christianity to mocking Donald Trump. As a religious man that reveres Jesus according to a doctrine of possibly being God come to earth in human form; I would not let myself watch the parts mocking Jesus and skipped over it; so I cannot comment on it, but I can imagine what intensely vulgar things they may have said.

The mocking of Donald Trump centered around accusations of an immoral immaturity and a small penis; with many clips involving the actually showing of a penis. This propaganda technique of small penis accusation seems designed to put the target in a trap of either addressing the issue which would then allow them to pivot into attacks on the seriousness of the target and mocking him for public speaking about what everyone knows is a private matter. This has already been done with the one vague response from Trump about “there is no problem there” back during the 2016 presidential debates; but it wasn’t enough for them to decide to pivot. Or else if the target ignores it, then they simply pile on and make the issue a meme anchor point for the immature masses to gather around. In the end, judging a person by the weapons they use, this kind of attack is only further evidence that Trump is a good guy, and his enemies are bad guys.

It is interesting to notice that out of the top 3 people involved in the creation of the show: Trey Parker, Matt Stone, Brian Graden: 2 of them are jewish (Stone & Graden). Is this a throwback to jewish vs Christian animosity (though they veil it by mocking all religions)? Considering Trump’s strong alliance with Israel, and much speaking against jew-hate; I have to wonder if possibly this is a move at reverse psychology to make Trump look good. I mean, what better can you do than to pair Trump up with the most respected figure in human history, one whose story involves being mocked, and to mock them side by side? If not reverse psychology, then these anti-Christian elements are just raging out with a full frontal attack on what they hate; casting attack strategy to the side perhaps because they do not see any other strategy. In any case, the 3% jewish American population once again showcases its involvement of 90% of American media and power moves. Granted, this high representation is a natural result of Israel being the front line of the war on Islamic world domination, which is the current center of civilizational struggle, and has been for the last 900 years since the fall of Constantinople. If today, and Israel, represent the climax of a 900 year world struggle, then it should be forgiven that jews are over-represented as they must seek verification from their allies by seeing their members placed in positions of power and influence; and at the same time their enemies must seek to pollute their reputation by putting ugly and corrupt jewish public figures in place; while at the same time a civil war element of the jewish race involves a struggle to keep in check jewish-supremacists. The white race also has notoriously had to manage itself on that same issue. The high association of jewish leaders with pushing trans and gay culture could also fall into one of these fog of war categories; I remain vigilant and suspicious; yet my current conclusion remains on the side of Israel against the world Islamic conquest. The new york city mayor candidate Zohran is an example of a religious Muslim man putting on the mantle of gay, whore, marxist communist supporter; so that I do not doubt that an element of Islamic jihad could involve the propping up of gay and trans culture within the jewish and western spheres. What little in my mind remains a doubt that perhaps the jewish element could be the actual bad guys, and the Islamic conquest is the good guys that innocently want their piece of the pie and that all the extreme anti-jew hatred and mainstream Hitler narrative against jews is correct? This simpleton jew-hater acceptance in 90% of the narrative of world war 2 seems so unlikely, yet I mention it in my investigative ponderings to be complete and showcase that I am indeed innocently searching for truth. The arab world seems like they have a long way to go in battling their own arab-Islamist supremacists within their own race; and I do not envy what seems like the enormous amount of work they have left to do when compared with the same category in the white and jewish races.

Returning to this blasphemous South Park episode. To summarize, while it certainly does an efficient job of rounding up the disgusting perverted masses into a collected mob to set upon Trump, I think the end result is a net positive for team Trump in that it further separates him from an ugly perverted anti-God enemy. The two sides are beginning to take shape, and it does not surprise me that the good guys appear beautiful and pure, while the bad guys appear ugly and vulgar.

Seig Heil.